Blog

The graduation dinner. The final prom. These are milestones meant to celebrate the end of childhood, but for parents emerging from high-conflict or abusive divorces, they can feel like a final battlefield.Too often, schools and event committees operate under a "co-parenting fantasy." They expect parents to set aside years of unimaginable pain, betrayal, or even violence to sit at a single table for the sake of "unity." But in reality, forcing victims of high-conflict dynamics to sit with their aggressors doesn't create peace—it creates a pressure cooker.The Risk of Forced Proximity When a school has no policy other than shaming parents into sitting together, they unknowingly enable:<ul><li>PTSD Triggers: Forcing a survivor to sit inches away from their harm-doer is a recipe for psychological distress.</li><li>Dominance Narratives: The aggressor often insists on the "united front" to maintain an image of normalcy or to continue exerting control.</li><li>Public Humiliation: If the tension snaps, it is the child who bears the shame of a scene on their special night. </li></ul>A New Approach: The Two-Table Solution True "Best Interests of the Child" (mandated by section 37 of the Family Law Act) is rooted in stability. Stability is not a fake smile at a dinner table; it is the absence of conflict.We must stop apologizing for the reality of the family and start managing it. This means requesting two separate tables, with the child having a dedicated seat at both. It allows the child to move freely between parents without being the "buffer" or the "witness."The Proposal to the School This letter focuses on the "Best Interests" and safety standards, moving the conversation away from "drama" and toward "risk management."Subject: Request for Accommodations: [Student Name] Graduation EventsDear [Administrator Name/Committee],I am writing regarding the upcoming graduation dinner for [Student Name]. Regarding the seating chart, our family requires a specific arrangement to ensure a safe, stable, and celebratory environment for our child.In accordance with the principles of section 37 of the Family Law Act—which prioritizes the child’s emotional safety and stability—we are requesting two separate tables for our family. <span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal); -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;" data-mce-style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal); -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;">We require spots at <span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal); -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;" data-mce-style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal); -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;">one table for [Parent A] and guest, and one table for [Parent B] and guest. <span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal); -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;" data-mce-style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal); -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;">We request a paid, designated seat for [Student Name] at both tables.<span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal); -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;" data-mce-style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal); -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;">In high-conflict family dynamics, forced proximity does not facilitate peace; it creates unnecessary risk of distress for the student. Providing two separate "home bases" allows [Student Name] to enjoy the milestone without the burden of managing parental tension.We understand that tickets are at a premium. We are prepared to pay the full cost for the additional seat to ensure the integrity of the event and the well-being of our child. We trust the school will support this pro-active measure to prevent conflict and honor [Student Name]’s achievement.The Conversation with the Child This script is designed to be validating, transparent, and focused on the child’s "right" to a peaceful night."I am so proud of you for reaching this milestone. This is the end of your childhood chapter and, in many ways, the end of the 'war' that our divorce has been.Because I love you, I refuse to let your graduation be about tension or walking on eggshells. I have asked the school to set up two separate tables, and you will have a seat at both. This isn't about us being 'difficult'—it’s about giving you the gift of two peaceful spaces.You don't have to worry about who is looking at whom or who is talking to whom. You can move between us freely. We are sorry that this is our family's reality, but we are choosing this solution because you have the right to a night that is 100% about your success and 0% about the past."

The "Graduation Truce" is a Dangerous Myth

Why Boundaries are a Parent’s Best FriendWhen parents enter Parenting Coordination (PC), they are often exhausted. You are likely looking for a referee, a tie-breaker, and—most of all—someone who can finally bring some stability to the chaos.As your Parenting Coordinator, my job is to help you resolve disputes without the soul-crushing delays and costs of a courtroom. To do that effectively, I have to work within a very specific set of professional "guardrails." To a parent in the heat of a dispute, these rules can sometimes feel rigid.However, these boundaries are actually my most important tool for helping your family. Here is why my professional standards are designed to protect you.&nbsp;1. The Symmetry of Time: Why I Track Every Minute In many high-conflict dynamics, the roles become asymmetrical. We often see one parent acting as the "Poker" (using subtle manipulation or high-conflict tactics) and the other as the "Poked" (reacting emotionally or becoming triggered).As your PC, I recognize these roles. However, I have to manage a very fine line regarding how I spend my time:The Bias Trap: If I spend three hours coaching the "Poked" parent on how to regulate their emotions, but only fifteen minutes with the "Poker," a lawyer or a judge may later view that lopsided time-tracking as evidence of bias. In the eyes of the law, unequal time is reframed as "alignment." The Standard: To protect my neutrality (and your decisions), I must maintain Structural Neutrality. If one parent requires significant skill-building to stop being triggered, and the other needs to recognize how their manipulation harms the children, I cannot be the one to provide that deep-dive coaching. 2. The Requirement for Outside Counselling Because I must remain a neutral arbitrator, I cannot become your therapist. When the family dynamic shifts, I will point out each parent's role in that conflict, but you must be prepared to do the work with outside experts.Pursuant to the authority in Odgers v. Odgers, 2014 BCSC 717 (CanLII), I may mandate specialized counselling (such as New Ways for Families).The "Poked" parent may need to build "internal armor" so that triggers no longer derail their parenting. The "Poker" parent may need to recognize how their behavior causes long-term, measurable harm to the children.3. The "No-Credit" Rule (Financial Integrity) I require a standard retainer to be maintained at all times. If the account hits zero, I "drop the pen" until it is topped up.The Reality: This isn’t just business; it is about protecting the integrity and neutrality of the process. If a parent owes me money, I technically become their creditor, which can create a perceived conflict of interest. To prevent this, the financial side must be settled upfront.However, I will not allow a parent to obstruct the process by withholding their portion of the retainer. Under the BC Parenting Coordination Roster Standard Agreement, I have the discretion to allow one parent to fund the process temporarily so that a necessary Determination can be reached. This ensures that the child’s stability and the "Best Interests" test under Section 37 are not held hostage by a breach of the agreement.Please be aware that the final Determination will formally allocate these fees according to the merits of the case. While this allows the work to move forward, a persistent failure to fund the process is a breach of the Parenting Coordination Agreement. If this breach is not corrected promptly, the parties may be required to return to court for enforcement and judicial intervention.4. "Adjective-Free" and "Review-Ready" Decisions When I write a formal Determination, I focus strictly on objective facts: dates, times, and specific actions. I must strip out subjective words like "toxic" or "stubborn" as PC work does not blame or criticize.The Reality: My goal is to create "Judge-Proof" decisions. If my decision is ever reviewed by a court, it must stand as a reasonable, evidence-based document anchored in Section 37 of the Family Law Act (Best Interests of the Child). This provides your family with a stable legal record that actually resolves the issue rather than fueling the fire.The Bottom Line A Parenting Coordinator’s boundaries are not a barrier to your family; they are the framework that allows your family to function. By being rigid about the process, I am able to be fair to the people.I am not here to be a "rescuer"—I am here to be a Process Guardian. When the process is protected, the children have a chance to thrive.

The Framework of Trust: Why My Professional Boundaries Protect Your Family

If you are dealing with a co-parent who treats every minor detail like a discovery and sends dozens of "paper-trail" emails a day, you are likely feeling two things: exhaustion and financial anxiety.You might be asking yourself: “Why am I paying a professional hundreds of dollars an hour just to watch my ex be difficult? This is an expensive waste of time.”It is a fair question. But here is the reality: Parenting Coordination is specifically designed for "impossible" situations. If your co-parent was easy to work with, you wouldn't need a PC. Here is how the process actually works to protect your wallet and your sanity when mediation feels like a dead end.1. From "Talking" to "Deciding" The biggest misconception is that Parenting Coordination is just "glorified mediation." It isn’t. While a PC will always try to help parents reach a consensus first, they have a "hidden" power: The Power of Determination.If one parent is using the process to obstruct, stall, or "second-guess" every agreement, the PC has the authority to stop the talking and start the deciding. By moving into a Determination Model, the PC acts as a private judge. They make a binding decision, and the debate ends. This stops the endless billable hours spent on circular arguments.2. Managing the "Paper Trail" High-conflict parents often try to use their PC as a witness to their grievances, CC’ing them on every minor complaint. This drives up costs for everyone.An effective PC manages this by:<ul><li>Streamlining Communication: Setting strict rules (e.g., one summary email per day).</li><li>Focusing on the "Right Now": The PC's job is not to relitigate the past or determine who was "right" in the marriage. Their job is to ensure the children have a functional schedule today.</li><li><span style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal); -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;" data-mce-style="font-family: inherit; font-size: calc(16px * var(--body-fontSize, 1)); font-style: var(--body-fontStyle, normal); -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%;">Identifying "Fight-or-Flight": Often, a difficult co-parent is acting out of a trauma response. A PC can identify when a parent is too dysregulated to mediate and may require them to seek outside counseling before returning to the table, saving you from paying for unproductive meetings.</li></ul>3. The Cost of Not Having a PC Without a PC, every disagreement—from a missed soccer practice to a holiday swap—often ends up back in front of a lawyer or a judge.Court is slower: You may wait months for a hearing. Court is more expensive: Legal fees for a single motion often dwarf the cost of a PC’s retainer. Court is blunt: A judge doesn't have the time to understand the nuances of your family’s specific needs like a PC does. The Bottom Line If it feels like your co-parent is "winning" by being difficult, remember that Parenting Coordination is a phased process. The "mediation" phase is an invitation to be reasonable. If that invitation is declined, the "determination" phase provides the finality you need.A PC’s goal isn't to make you best friends with your ex; it’s to build a "firewall" between their behavior and your children’s well-being. By moving to short-form decisions and firm boundaries, the PC actually saves you money in the long run by cutting off the oxygen to the conflict.

Is Parenting Coordination a Waste of Money When Your Co-Parent Won’t Budge?

beautiful classic rainbow across in the blue sky after the rain

If you have been ordered or have agreed to work with a Parenting Coordinator (PC), you are likely coming from a place of high stress and high conflict. You might be used to the "adversarial" nature of a courtroom—where there is a winner, a loser, and a judge who decides who is "right."Parenting Coordination is different. My role is not to be a judge or a witness to your past conflicts. My role is to be a process manager and a teacher.Here is the "Creed" that governs how I handle your file to ensure the process remains affordable, neutral, and focused on your children.1. I am a Teacher, Not a Witness The goal of a PC is to move you toward self-management.The Teaching Mandate: I provide the tools—counseling recommendations, communication protocols, and templates—to help you resolve disputes without future dependence on professional intervention.The "No Witness" Rule: I do not participate in your litigation. My only "voice" in the legal system is through formal Determinations. This is a shield that protects my neutrality; the moment I am perceived as a witness for one side, my ability to teach the other side effectively ends.2. The "Stop-Watch" Rule: Guarding the Balance of Time In high-conflict situations, time is often weaponized. If a PC spends significantly more time reading one parent’s emails, it can be perceived as "alignment."I prioritize joint meetings and "CC’d" emails. This ensures both parents receive the same information at the exact same time. If one parent drives 80% of the PC’s billable time through excessive emails or meritless complaints, Section 17 of the FLA Regulations allows for the reapportionment of costs. This isn't about blame; it is the financial reality of how much time that parent is consuming.3. Efficiency Over Excess: Making Decisions Affordable A PC should not be a "luxury item" that bankrupts a family. To keep costs down, I follow an Efficiency Clause:Recommendation vs. Determination: I use informal "Recommendations" for minor day-to-day issues to save you money. Formal "Determinations" are reserved for serious breaches. I generally do not accept long submissions. I require a concise 1-3 page summaries of the Facts, and your Proposed Remedy.4. The BIFF Approach to Communication To keep the peace, our communication must be BIFF: Brief, Informative, Friendly (professional), and Firm (your boundary, not bossy).Teaching without Blame:My job is not to focus exclusively on "Why" something happened, as that invites excuses and conflict. My job is to ask "What’s next?" * Instead of focusing on a past failure (e.g., "You missed the hockey practice"), we focus on the restorative protocol (e.g., "The agreement requires attendance; since it didn't happen, Parent B now has the Right of First Refusal to transport the child").5. The "Fork in the Road" Model Every issue we face has a clear path regarding cost and outcome:Coaching/Teaching - Changing behavior for the future - Shared 50/50. New Protocols - Creating clearer rules to stop the "gray area." - Shared 50/50. Formal Determination - Recording a breach of an order or agreement -100% paid by the breaching party. &nbsp; 6. Maintaining the "Impenetrable Midline" To remain effective, I must maintain a clinical distance. I cannot align with either parent, nor can I get caught in the middle of personal attacks. By focusing on objective criteria—the Family Law Act and your Order or Agreement—we ensure the process remains fair.Summary: Parenting Coordination is a roadmap to stability. By following these rules, we ensure the process is a tool for your child’s well-being, rather than another battlefield for the adults.

The Parenting Coordinator’s Creed: How I Work to Keep You Out of Court

Parenting Coordination (PC) is designed to move families out of the courtroom and into a functional, child-focused dynamic. However, a significant challenge arises when, after weeks of negotiation and mounting fees, one parent treats a final agreement as a mere suggestion.In BC, failing to follow a signed PC agreement isn't just a "misunderstanding"—it is a failure to uphold the best interests of the child and a potential trigger for significant legal and financial consequences.1. The Legal "Teeth": Filing under Section 44 A PC agreement is not a "gentleman’s agreement." Under Section 44 of the Family Law Act, a written agreement respecting parenting arrangements may be filed with the court.Once filed, the agreement has the same force and effect as a court order for the purposes of enforcement. You are no longer asking for a favor; you are expecting compliance with a legal obligation.2. The "Fork in the Road": Strategic Responses to a Breach If a parent acts contrary to a filed agreement—such as failing to take the children to their hockey practice—the compliant parent faces a strategic choice. You must advise the PC of the breach and decide on one of two paths (or a hybrid of both):Path A: The Enforcement &amp; Oversight Route (Returning to Court)&nbsp;If the breach shows a fundamental lack of cooperation, you may choose to proceed to court for enforcement. Because the agreement is filed under s. 44, the court can treat the breach as a violation of an order.The Hybrid "Last Hope": Many clients return to court not just for "punishment," but to request mandatory specialized counselling and court supervision of the PC process. This allows a Judge to oversee the remedial process while keeping the children’s interests at the forefront. Cost Reallocation: This is the time to discuss the reapportionment of costs for these interventions, including counselling and PC fees, ensuring the breaching parent bears the financial weight of the remedy. Path B: The "Teaching" Route (The PC Determination)&nbsp;Alternatively, the PC process can be used to give the breaching party another chance to reform within the PC's mandate. This involves a formal Determination aimed at rehabilitating the dynamic through:<ul><li>Mandatory Specialized Counselling: Targeting the root causes of non-compliance or alienating behavior.</li><li>Right of First Refusal: Requiring the parent to give immediate notice if they cannot attend a practice (minimum 24 hours) so the other parent has the opportunity to take the children.</li><li>Cost Penalties: Under Section 17 of the FLA Regulation, the party in breach is typically responsible for 100% of the costs of the Determination process. </li></ul>3. Capacity and the PC’s Role While PCs try to teach and reform, a formal Determination of breach is a significant mark against a parent’s capacity. It provides objective evidence that a parent may be unable to put the child’s needs first.A Note on PC Neutrality: PCs are not litigators; their mandate is to stay out of the courtroom to maintain absolute impartiality. Their input is limited to what is outlined in their written Determinations. They remain in a rehabilitative role, focused on reform rather than blame. However, if a parent refuses to learn, the PC’s paper trail may become the primary evidence used by a Judge to potentially remove decision-making authority over specific areas, like education or sports.The Roadmap for Parents If you are facing a breach, avoid "text-message wars." Instead:<ul><li>Document the Fact: Keep a neutral record of missed events.</li><li>Notify the PC: Advise them of the breach immediately.</li><li>Choose Your Path: Decide if you want a "teaching" Determination or if it is time to return to court for supervised enforcement and mandatory counselling.</li><li>Accept the Guidance: If you are the parent in breach, take the "hint." The PC process is an opportunity to reform before the court takes the decision-making out of your hands entirely.</li></ul>

When PC Agreements are Ignored: Enforcement and Capacity

Brother and sister looking at a smartphone and enjoying time together at home

A Guide for Parents in Shared Parenting ArrangementsIn a "week-on, week-off" schedule, seven days can feel like a lifetime to an elementary-aged child. While adults focus on the calendar and logistics, children live in the emotional "now." When they are at one house, the other parent can feel out of reach.A brief midweek connection—a "Bridge Call"—is one of the most effective ways to maintain a child's sense of security and continuity.The Psychology of the "Bridge Connection" Psychologists emphasize that for children under 12, frequent and continuous contact is vital for Attachment Security by:<ul><li>Reducing Separation Anxiety: A scheduled 10-minute "hello" on a Wednesday prevents the "missingness" that often peaks mid-week.</li><li>Normalization: When a child sees that they can talk to Dad while at Mom’s house (and vice versa), it gives them "psychological permission" to love both parents. This reduces the risk of loyalty binds, where a child feels they must "forget" one parent to be loyal to the one they are currently with.</li><li>Relational Continuity: Sharing a small win—like a good grade or a funny story from recess—in real-time is much more impactful for a child than trying to remember it five days later. &nbsp; Logistics: Lowering the Friction Many parents worry that a midweek call creates "contact" between the adults that leads to conflict. The goal is to make the call parent-neutral. If the use of a personal cell phone feels like an "invasion" of privacy, consider these alternatives:</li><li>A dedicated Tablet;</li><li>A landline or WiFi "House" Phone</li><li>a Gizmo/Apple Watch &nbsp; The "Private Room" Approach: It is often healthiest for a child to take the call in a private space (like their bedroom or a playroom). This prevents the "audience effect," where a child feels they are being monitored. As long as the child is safe, privacy allows them to speak freely and naturally.</li></ul>&nbsp;Sample Midweek Conduct Agreement To ensure the focus stays entirely on the child, parents can adopt a formal Conduct Agreement. This removes the guesswork and sets clear boundaries. Terms may include:<ol><li>The conversation shall be limited to the child’s life (school, friends, hobbies). Parents shall not ask the child about the other parent’s household, dating life, or spending.</li><li>This time is not for scheduling or "checking in" with the other parent. All adult business must be handled by OFW or email.</li><li>Calls are capped at 10 minutes. This ensures the call is a "treat" rather than a chore that interrupts the child’s evening routine.</li><li>The parent with the children agrees to provide a quiet space for the call. The calling parent agrees to remain upbeat and supportive of the child’s time in the other home.</li><li>Sarcasm, "digs," or criticisms of the other parent’s household (e.g., meals, bedtimes, or decor) are strictly prohibited. &nbsp; The Bottom Line Parental safety and peace of mind are important, but they can be protected through technology and clear rules. When we prioritize the "Midweek Bridge," we tell the child: “You are allowed to be connected to both of your worlds at the same time.” That is the foundation of a healthy, resilient child.</li></ol>

Cori L. McGuire Parenting Coordinator

Blog

The "Graduation Truce" is a Dangerous Myth

The Framework of Trust: Why My Professional Boundaries Pr...

Is Parenting Coordination a Waste of Money When Your Co-P...

The Parenting Coordinator’s Creed: How I Work to Keep You...

When PC Agreements are Ignored: Enforcement and Capacity

The Midweek Bridge: Why a 10-Minute Hello Matters